Use quality, coverage, freshness, practical usefulness, methodology, and traceability to judge each option. The goal is not a universal winner; it is the best next step for the task, the risk level, and the amount of control you need.
Guide: Compare Methods: Choose the Right Starting Approach
Compare idea, prompt, and provided by fit, tradeoffs, and evidence needs before you move forward.
Read guideGuide: Compare Methods: Choose the Right Starting Approach
Idea-first
Best when you need speed, early direction, or a rough frame to explore. Tradeoff: lower specificity and more follow-up work to make the path testable.
Prompt-first
Best when you already know the task shape and need more control over behavior and output. Tradeoff: stronger precision, but it depends on clearer assumptions and tighter method choices.
Provided-first
Best when you have material to anchor against and need traceability to an existing starting point. Tradeoff: higher grounding, but less freedom to broaden beyond what was supplied.
Shortlist logic and research backlog
Pick the method that best balances speed, control, and specificity for the current task. If you are unsure, compare the options that score highest on traceability and practical fit, then backlog the open checks: what evidence is missing, what assumptions are untested, and what quality signals still need validation.